Every fix breaks something
There are no tests, so nobody knows what a change will touch until users report it.
You shipped quickly with Cursor, Lovable, Bolt or Claude. Now there are real users, and every change seems to break something else. We pick up the code as it is and get it under control.
There are no tests, so nobody knows what a change will touch until users report it.
API keys in the frontend, open database rules, no rate limits. Common in generated code and easy to miss.
The codebase outgrew what the assistant can keep in mind. Each new prompt leaves it messier, and nobody can say why things were built the way they were.
We read the code, check security and dependencies, and send you a written report with the risks ranked by what they could cost you.
Tests around the parts that matter most, CI, error monitoring and secrets moved out of the code. Then refactoring in small steps while the product stays live.
New features, hosting and support, or engineers who join your team.
There’s nothing wrong with starting this way. Our engineers work with Cursor and Claude every day. What usually goes missing is code review, tests and a person who owns each merge. That’s what we bring to your project.
We rarely suggest a rewrite. When we do, it’s because the audit showed it would cost less than fixing what’s there.